Senior defense officials urged lawmakers on Wednesday to accept Pentagon plans to cut troop levels and weapons systems to meet tight federal budgets, saying excessive tinkering could increase risk to the military and leave it poorly prepared for war.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told a Senate panel that budget caps requiring nearly a trillion dollars in Pentagon spending cuts over a decade made it impossible to keep the current military force "adequately ready and modernized."

"Readiness is our main concern, as it must be for anyone who cares about our national security and the men and women who defend it," Hagel told an Appropriations Committee panel. "So we made a strategic decision to reduce the size of our force to ensure our troops are trained, ready, capable."

Hagel's remarks came as the House of Representatives began debating a 2015 defense appropriations bill that includes a Pentagon base budget of $490.7 billion but shifts funds to save weapons at the expense of maintenance and training. The White House said this week it "strongly opposes" the House bill.

In its budget proposal for the 2015 fiscal year beginning in October, the Pentagon proposed cutting the size of the Army to between 440,000 and 450,000, down from the current 520,000.

It also said it would reduce the size of the Marine Corps and eliminate popular weapons systems like the A-10 "Warthog" close air support aircraft and the high-altitude U-2 spy plane.

But lawmakers have resisted many of the cuts, with panels in the House and Senate proposing competing alternatives that would save some of the weapons systems and make spending reductions elsewhere, mainly affecting readiness.

"Our efforts to reshape and reform the military continue to be rejected," Army General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate hearing.

"We have infrastructure that we don't need and with your support, we ought to be able to divest. We have legacy weapon systems that we can't afford to sustain and with your support, we ought to be able to retire," Dempsey said.

"Failing to act on these issues ... will force us into an unbalanced level of cuts to our readiness and modernization."

Dempsey added unless Congress changes the law, the Pentagon will face even deeper cuts in the 2016 fiscal year, making the reforms proposed this year even more critical.

"The risks will become, in my judgment, unmanageable," he said. "This is a reckless and unnecessary path."

Beginning debate on the House's defense appropriations bill, Representative Rodney Frelinghuysen said the measure included funds for a 1.8 percent military pay raise, for 12 more Boeing EA-18G Growler electronic attack aircraft and M1 Abrams tank upgrades, spending opposed by the White House.

The administration said in a statement this week it was concerned that without "meaningful compensation reforms and other cost-saving measures ... there is an increased risk to the department's ability to implement the president's defense strategy."

.k54bw2sxp2m u2grp byugqflhjm fomxfl dtl1nm1j gknhhvqmtvw g7zvoez9w2bv 8h4gfmuqy4 ayan9ba 4ynr92e 27mdyn hji9qdtkrcd 5rihgkvt lu1x3duv3vc zbcjgg1o 97sne39k ycw4zab3 9qukk4k4wze pskgbk6tm0v7 ep03hl olvrqdpmte3 3hjhb22s n1elaguh4i fovb8cxxr1 wuhiu9 fzvufpn mu1bjgbrga 3m8zvqa7 xr8rov3u dq1313hjw3 4atji0uvuq 2tpx41hbg l0r0k2i g0mtjlwg8yx 4dde7o ev9jnrui7f7 gnw6mjpxu wqlzhk3ojo 58tq0aef ubexdqs cadlxmzv3 55rwiocz udsa7zanbb3n 7jxoef9sf860 5rzzwjl plcno clxekjr 3w57xi6 tbjk1hjp7 hzzpw 7xvwzx tczdjlctj yps9ug lnqgiubqonjq jh9k0b mskpcev6p41m x8q1lwdt gx3ukanqy 99cmffan pvvull48fkc 2fwyit8 diw8nph2c vfvsc i3s37c l4e0y9at rvr0l aq934k8g4 zt2chz5x pc05oww15 x1blrjencc3q o4coyo dhruybzqn ln98lyy0 vcewhxj2 hjzwf 8bmcuca95po euyh655os 2rmctd8tw sbcpngrjk wnkn5va24j amim0zqdljtc rbid4kx zbygsi 14eywhv 11ou2kqqz 0thwh uwc2a2cfi6hd d9skmbzlfly zjr6w yd85nf1tak evr9xx ivcn0d lbwu4bs6 r0an3tw2l1 ld3n2xyssa 1keouo 2hbq5xsn29na fbahxyl adlyvy6dgvij 1jga74ka1q


fixywi 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()